Dev Manifold Markets
closedA Minute Ago
asd50%chance
:45:30:1508:170%50%100%
the community guidelines are extremely clear that this behavior is allowed. https://help.manifold.markets/community-guidelines "Market creators have the final say on what the resolution is, even if it is inaccurate."
I can understand some of the reasons for it, although I personally am in favor of allowing authors to resolve markets in 99% of cases but being able to correct obviously wrong resolutions in cases like this:
/jack/poll-should-it-be-possible-to-dispu
If you are considering massive reputation penalties for wrong resolution, even up to a ban, then why? Why not just fix the wrong resolution instead? Policy-wise, it makes no sense to me to penalize/ban someone for a wrong resolution rather but still say "authors are allowed to do whatever resolution they want". Technically, right now it is not possible to undo and fix a resolution, but that really is important for both accidental misresolutions as well, and I suspect that fixing resolutions is easier to implement technically than implementing a robust reputation system that works half as well as simply fixing the wrong resolutions.
the community guidelines are extremely clear that this behavior is allowed. https://help.manifold.markets/community-guidelines "Market creators have the final say on what the resolution is, even if it is inaccurate."
I can understand some of the reasons for it, although I personally am in favor of allowing authors to resolve markets in 99% of cases but being able to correct obviously wrong resolutions in cases like this:
/jack/poll-should-it-be-possible-to-dispu
If you are considering massive reputation penalties for wrong resolution, even up to a ban, then why? Why not just fix the wrong resolution instead? Policy-wise, it makes no sense to me to penalize/ban someone for a wrong resolution rather but still say "authors are allowed to do whatever resolution they want". Technically, right now it is not possible to undo and fix a resolution, but that really is important for both accidental misresolutions as well, and I suspect that fixing resolutions is easier to implement technically than implementing a robust reputation system that works half as well as simply fixing the wrong resolutions.
the community guidelines are extremely clear that this behavior is allowed. https://help.manifold.markets/community-guidelines "Market creators have the final say on what the resolution is, even if it is inaccurate."
I can understand some of the reasons for it, although I personally am in favor of allowing authors to resolve markets in 99% of cases but being able to correct obviously wrong resolutions in cases like this:
/jack/poll-should-it-be-possible-to-dispu
If you are considering massive reputation penalties for wrong resolution, even up to a ban, then why? Why not just fix the wrong resolution instead? Policy-wise, it makes no sense to me to penalize/ban someone for a wrong resolution rather but still say "authors are allowed to do whatever resolution they want". Technically, right now it is not possible to undo and fix a resolution, but that really is important for both accidental misresolutions as well, and I suspect that fixing resolutions is easier to implement technically than implementing a robust reputation system that works half as well as simply fixing the wrong resolutions.
the community guidelines are extremely clear that this behavior is allowed. https://help.manifold.markets/community-guidelines "Market creators have the final say on what the resolution is, even if it is inaccurate."
I can understand some of the reasons for it, although I personally am in favor of allowing authors to resolve markets in 99% of cases but being able to correct obviously wrong resolutions in cases like this:
/jack/poll-should-it-be-possible-to-dispu
If you are considering massive reputation penalties for wrong resolution, even up to a ban, then why? Why not just fix the wrong resolution instead? Policy-wise, it makes no sense to me to penalize/ban someone for a wrong resolution rather but still say "authors are allowed to do whatever resolution they want". Technically, right now it is not possible to undo and fix a resolution, but that really is important for both accidental misresolutions as well, and I suspect that fixing resolutions is easier to implement technically than implementing a robust reputation system that works half as well as simply fixing the wrong resolutions.
the community guidelines are extremely clear that this behavior is allowed. https://help.manifold.markets/community-guidelines "Market creators have the final say on what the resolution is, even if it is inaccurate."
I can understand some of the reasons for it, although I personally am in favor of allowing authors to resolve markets in 99% of cases but being able to correct obviously wrong resolutions in cases like this:
/jack/poll-should-it-be-possible-to-dispu
If you are considering massive reputation penalties for wrong resolution, even up to a ban, then why? Why not just fix the wrong resolution instead? Policy-wise, it makes no sense to me to penalize/ban someone for a wrong resolution rather but still say "authors are allowed to do whatever resolution they want". Technically, right now it is not possible to undo and fix a resolution, but that really is important for both accidental misresolutions as well, and I suspect that fixing resolutions is easier to implement technically than implementing a robust reputation system that works half as well as simply fixing the wrong resolutions.
Show Less
M$3,212,75411NotificationsMore
1,000
3.00