Is funding Ugandans to study in Germany is at least 10x more effective than GiveDirectly cash transfers? Lasts a week. Can resolve ambiguously.
5
100Ṁ107Jan 25
9%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
This tweet says that Ugandan's studying in Germany is funding constrained. https://twitter.com/jhaushofer/status/1483466480260120578
In a week, will I think that it's at least 10x more effective than GiveDirectly cash transfers to developing nations. (ie comparable to GiveWell's top charities). If I don't know, the market will resolve ambiguously.
The market resolves "Yes" if I think it is likely to be and "No" if I think it's likely not to be. Feel free to try and convince me.
Jan 18, 4:32pm: If the market resolves ambiguously, all money will be returned to traders.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Related questions
Related questions
Will the most cost-effective charity on Givewell's cost effectiveness spreadsheet at the end of 2022 be a Vitamin A supplementation charity?
75% chance
Will we fund "Better Debates"?
50% chance
Will we fund "Better Debates"?
50% chance
Will we fund the "Longtermist Animal Incubation Project"?
50% chance
Will we fund the "Happier Lives Institute"?
59% chance
Will we fund "Brain-inspired AGI"?
55% chance
Will we fund "Curiosity Fellowship"?
50% chance
Will we fund "Growth Teams"?
55% chance
Will we fund "Socio-political impacts of nuclear winter"?
55% chance
Test question
50% chance